NASB 95 vs. NASB 20 | Baptist Christian Forums
网页2021年11月7日 · 1,173. Faith: Baptist. I prefer NASB 95 because it is the one that I own. (When using on-line translations, I prefer to compare MANY versions to get more of a “many counselors” view of an important verse or paragraph.) #3 atpollard, Nov 7, 2021. Agree x 2.
NASB? - The Puritan Board
网页2021年4月23日 · I use the ESV so the 95 is no major advantage to me, because it seems to me the 95 is less literal than the 77. Here is a classic example. In 1 Pet 1:13 both the NASB 95 and the ESV read "Therefore, prepare your minds for action". The LSB follows the NASB 77 and is more literal. It reads "Therefore, having girded your minds for action".
NASB 1977 vs 1995 - The Puritan Board
网页Oct 4, 2020. #3. Rutherglen1794 said: I prefer the 1977. I note that in 1 Peter 1 the NASB 77 uses the literal "gird the loins of your mind" whereas the NASB 95 reads "prepare your minds for action". I was surprised a literal translation would change to a less literal rendering. B.
New American Standard Bible 2020 Update - Baptist Christian …
网页2018年11月17日 · Faith: Baptist. Since September 12, 2018, the Lockman Foundation has been posting passages on their Facebook page identified as NASB 2020. There's a nice review of the selections posted on the blog Opened Heart. Here are some highlights with comparisons between the old and the new, New American …
NASB 2020 or CSB 2020? - The Puritan Board
网页Puritan Board Freshman. Dec 18, 2020. #1. Hello all. First I must mention that I am highly aware of the many posts here on the board concerning both the NASB 2020 and/or the CSB. However, since the CSB was slightly revised for 2020, I am curious to hear your thoughts on how these two translations now compare.
Has Anyone Used Both The NASB And ESV Enough To Fairly And …
网页2020年1月28日 · A feature I like for studying, which can be a little controversial, is that the NASB marks works that it adds for clarity in italics (like the KJV/NKJV) which the ESV does not. I use the NASB as one of my main translations for in-depth study, alongside the NKJV. By the way, I am referring to the NASB 1995, not earlier editions, in my post.
NASB 1977 vs. 1995 edition - Baptist Christian Forums
网页2007年7月5日 · Amy.G New Member. This is for my brothers who are the resident experts in Bible versions. I'm really enjoying the NASB, but found out it is the 1977 edition. I keep hearing that the 1995 is better and easier to read. The edition I have isn't difficult to read, at least I don't think so, so I was just wondering what the differences are between ...
1 Peter 4:19 - NASB 1995 vs 1977 - The Puritan Board
网页Jan 21, 2020. #1. I’m trying to figure out why the NASB changed 1 Peter 4:19 (“Let those who suffer according to the will of God entrust their souls…”) from imperative (“let them entrust”) in the 1977 edition to indicative (“they shall entrust”) in the 1995 edition. It’s imperative in the Greek (to the best of my knowledge of ...
Legacy Standard Bible - some thoughts | The Puritan Board
网页Dec 11, 2020. #1. The Legacy Standard Bible now has an informative Website. Home - Legacy Standard Bible (lsbible.org) There is a lot of useful information there including Blog posts, Video library and the goals and translation approach of the impending LSB. It looks like they are trying to combine the strengths of both the NASB 77 and 95.
NASB2020 Head-To-Head With ESV | Baptist Christian Forums
网页2022年3月3日 · This thread concerns the 2020 NASB, but I am sure that the 1995 version would generally use the same kind of phraseology. I'll use N to stand for the NASB2020 and E to stand for the ESV. Luke 23:41. N : And we indeed are …