NASB 1977 vs 1995 - The Puritan Board
网页Oct 4, 2020. #3. Rutherglen1794 said: I prefer the 1977. I note that in 1 Peter 1 the NASB 77 uses the literal "gird the loins of your mind" whereas the NASB 95 reads "prepare your minds for action". I was surprised a literal translation would change to a less literal rendering. B.
NASB? - The Puritan Board
网页2021年4月23日 · I use the ESV so the 95 is no major advantage to me, because it seems to me the 95 is less literal than the 77. Here is a classic example. In 1 Pet 1:13 both the NASB 95 and the ESV read "Therefore, prepare your minds for action". The LSB follows the NASB 77 and is more literal. It reads "Therefore, having girded your minds for action".
1 Peter 4:19 - NASB 1995 vs 1977 | The Puritan Board
网页Jan 21, 2020. #1. I’m trying to figure out why the NASB changed 1 Peter 4:19 (“Let those who suffer according to the will of God entrust their souls…”) from imperative (“let them entrust”) in the 1977 edition to indicative (“they shall entrust”) in the 1995 edition. It’s imperative in the Greek (to the best of my knowledge of ...
Has Anyone Used Both The NASB And ESV Enough To Fairly And …
网页2020年1月28日 · A feature I like for studying, which can be a little controversial, is that the NASB marks works that it adds for clarity in italics (like the KJV/NKJV) which the ESV does not. I use the NASB as one of my main translations for in-depth study, alongside the NKJV. By the way, I am referring to the NASB 1995, not earlier editions, in my post.
NASB 2020 or CSB 2020? - The Puritan Board
网页Puritan Board Freshman. Dec 18, 2020. #1. Hello all. First I must mention that I am highly aware of the many posts here on the board concerning both the NASB 2020 and/or the CSB. However, since the CSB was slightly revised for 2020, I am curious to hear your thoughts on how these two translations now compare.
NASB vs KJV - The Puritan Board
网页Arbitrary Moderation. May 20, 2009. #2. Hoping this does not turn into a translations debate -- both are quite literal in their translation; presumably, if one prefers the KJV, one will say it is more literal; if one prefers the NASB, they will say it is more literal. But, it's hard to be more literal than literal, if you catch my drift.
Quality of the NASB? - The Puritan Board
网页Puritan Board Freshman. May 12, 2015. #2. Technically it is the "New American Standard Bible" (NASB). The NKJV and NASB are based on different New Testament text types. The former on the Textus Receptus and the latter on the critical text. I would recommend having translations from both text types.
Legacy Standard Bible - some thoughts | The Puritan Board
网页Dec 11, 2020. #1. The Legacy Standard Bible now has an informative Website. Home - Legacy Standard Bible (lsbible.org) There is a lot of useful information there including Blog posts, Video library and the goals and translation approach of the impending LSB. It looks like they are trying to combine the strengths of both the NASB 77 and 95.
? About NASB vs ESV. | Page 2 | The Puritan Board
网页2008年4月2日 · The ESV is a good 'overall' bible. If accuracy is the main issue, then the ASV [1901] is the most accurate. Further, the NASB update is less accurate than the original NASB - these factors led me to use the ESV as having a good balance. As for bias, the NASB has a premillennial bias in a few places - eg, how it translates Daniel 12:1-2.
? About NASB vs ESV. | Page 3 | The Puritan Board
网页2008年4月2日 · About NASB vs ESV. Thread starter etexas; Start date Apr 2, 2008; ... NASB 1977 vs 1995. Stephen L Smith ...
跳至内容