Is the NKJV based on the Textus Receptus or the Critical Text?
网页2008年8月29日 · What they wanted was a version that was based on what they considered the best manuscripts available, namely the Textus Receptus or the Majority Text which also underlies the AV. As Dr. Arthur L. Farstad, Executive Editor of the New King James Version wrote: "the NKJV is an update of an historic version translated from a specific type of text.
Why choose the NKJV over the ESV (or vice-versa)
网页Puritan Board Junior. Oct 1, 2009. #1. I was asked today why someone would choose the NKJV over the ESV. They were wondering because both sound "KJVish", are both literal, and even though the NT uses different texts the NKJV makes up for this in the footnotes. I said I wasn't exactly sure why some people choose one over the other (I gave some ...
KJV 2016 Version Published - The Puritan Board
网页2016年1月13日 · The translators of the King James Version 2016 believe that the King James Version of 1611-1900 is an accurate translation of the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and is thus by default, the words of God in English. Unfortunately for the KJV, the English language is constantly developing and many word meanings today vastly differ …
Updated American Standard Version (UASV) 2021 - The Puritan …
网页2021年12月6日 · New King James Version--- I would personally like to see a MINOR and I mean MINOR revision to help improve some of its renderings of certain words to better reflect the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek a bit more closely (examples: "power" to "authority" in certain contexts in the Gospels, etc.) This would be a great translation to …
New King James Or NIV? - The Puritan Board
网页2015年1月13日 · Puritan Board Graduate. Jan 12, 2015. #5. Edward said: Unless its an original version of the NIV, it is only suitable for burning. I'd vote for the NKJV over the ESV, but ESV is what we've standardized on at church, so it's what I'm currently using. Either NKJV or ESV would be suitable for your purposes.
Joel Beeke: King James Version Study Bible | The Puritan Board
网页Oct 19, 2012. #1. From Joel Beeke's site (post: King James Version Study Bible): Reformation Heritage Books is excited to announce the planned publication of a new study Bible. Amid the vast array of study Bibles written in the past century, there has not been a single Study Bible using the beloved and trusted King James Version written from a ...
KJV Update Project - The Puritan Board
网页2023年3月28日 · The New King James Version (NKJV) in fact is not a strict update of the KJV into contemporary English, for it contains new translation from the original languages and significantly differs in meaning from the KJV in many places (e.g. Genesis 49:6, 2 Kings 23:29, Job 17:6, Psalm 139:16, Isaiah 9:3, Matthew 6:13).
21st Century King James Version (KJ21) | The Puritan Board
网页2006年9月7日 · The text of the 21st Century King James Version (KJ21), maybe quoted in any form (written, visual, electronic, or audio) up to and inclusive of two hundred (200) verses without prior written permission of the publisher, provided that the verses quoted do not account for more than 40 percent of the work in which they are quoted, and provided ...
KJV vs. 1599 Geneva - The Puritan Board
网页2008年3月5日 · Its language flows better, in my opinion, and for memorization purposes, the KJV is superior and also, for memorization purposes, incorporated into the Westminster Standards. The Geneva Notes are very good (especially Junius on Revelation), but I do differ from them in a few places. My 1599 Geneva by Tolle Lege doesn't have the …
NKJV?? - The Puritan Board
网页Feb 18, 2012. #14. As someone who used the NKJV for 5 years or more of preaching, and now has used the ESV for 5+ years (and appreciates both) for me much of it comes down to publisher quality. The NKJV had the hard Providence to be exclusively a Nelson product. My experience has been that Nelson makes very bad Bibles.