Why should you use strncpy instead of strcpy? - Stack Overflow
网页This may be used in many other scenarios, where you need to copy only a portion of your original string to the destination. Using strncpy () you can copy a limited portion of the original string as opposed by strcpy (). I see the code you have put up comes from publib.boulder.ibm.com. answered Aug 11, 2009 at 5:29.
c - Correct way to use strcpy () function? - Stack Overflow
网页2018年6月11日 · The second way is correct. The return value of strcpy() is always the same as its first argument, so your first version is equivalent to: strcpy(s1, s2); s1 = s1; That second assignment is obviously pointless. And it would be invalid if s1 were an array rather than a pointer variable, since you can't assign to arrays. edited Jun 11, 2018 at 21:33.
c - strcpy vs. memcpy - Stack Overflow
网页2010年5月24日 · strcpy terminates when the source string's null terminator is found. memcpy requires a size parameter be passed. In the case you presented the printf statement is halting after the null terminator is found for both character arrays, however you will find t[3] and t[4] have copied data in them as well.
c++ - Difference between 'strcpy' and 'strcpy_s'? - Stack Overflow
网页2023年9月30日 · 50. strcpy is a unsafe function. When you try to copy a string using strcpy() to a buffer which is not large enough to contain it, it will cause a buffer overflow. strcpy_s() is a security enhanced version of strcpy(). With strcpy_s you can specify the size of the destination buffer to avoid buffer overflows during copies.
c - How strcpy works behind the scenes? - Stack Overflow
网页2013年2月6日 · strcpy() preforms its task until it sees the '\0' character. printf() also preforms its task until it sees the '\0' character. sizeof() on the other hand is not interested in the content of the array, only its allocated size (how big it is supposed to be), thus not taking into consideration where the string/character array actually ends (how ...
Strcpy implementation in C - Stack Overflow
网页2013年1月23日 · You can use this code, the simpler the better ! Inside while () we copy char by char and moving pointer to the next. When the last char \0 will pass and copy while receive 0 and stop. void StrCopy( char* _dst, const char* _src ) {. while((*_dst++ = *_src++)); }
c - strcpy() return value - Stack Overflow
网页strcpy(dst, src) returning dst is analogous to x=y evaluating to the x. So it makes strcpy work like a string assignment operator. As other answers point out, this allows nesting, like foo( strcpy(buf,input) );. Early computers were very memory-constrained. Keeping your source code compact was common practice.
c - How does strcpy_s work? - Stack Overflow
网页2016年4月12日 · 5. MSDN Says "The strcpy_s function copies the contents in the address of strSource, including the terminating null character, to the location that's specified by strDestination. The destination string must be large enough to hold the source string and its terminating null character.
c++ - how can I use strcpy safely - Stack Overflow
网页2012年10月11日 · char c[100]; c is now an array of 100 chars. That area of memory is completely separate from everything else so far. strcpy(c, a); The contents of c (to be specific, the first 15 bytes) now hold the same values as the memory pointed to by a. So now there are two regions of memory that contain the same string data.
string - Why is strcpy unsafe in C? - Stack Overflow
网页2014年4月27日 · 12. strcpy has no way of knowing how large the destination buffer is (i.e. there is no length parameter) so sloppy programming using it can lead to overrunning the buffer and corrupting other memory. Such an overrun can lead to crashes, odd behaviour and may be exploitable by malware authors. BTW, look at …
跳至内容