The Pella 150 Series is part of the Replacement Windows test program at Consumer Reports. In our lab tests, Double-hung window models like the 150 Series are rated on multiple criteria ...

The Pella ThermaStar is part of the Replacement Windows test program at Consumer Reports. In our lab tests, Double-hung window models like the ThermaStar are rated on multiple criteria ...

Pella and Andersen both offer high-quality windows. Pella is better for standard vinyl and aluminum windows, while Andersen is ideal for unique windows. Pella’s windows cost $300 to $4,000 each ...

We created and used a detailed methodology to compare Pella to more than 15 replacement window companies. Our team read the Pella website, perused the sites of contractors and dealers, examined ...

Budget options are available from Milgard, while Pella offers consumers a vast range of pricing to fit almost any replacement window budget. We’ve also included everything you need to know about ...

The national average window replacement cost ranges from $734 to ... Some window brands we reviewed — including Pella and Andersen — sell their products at Home Depot and other home ...

North-facing windows may provide the best views while sacrificing privacy and energy savings. Ground-level crank-out casement ...

Pricing information shown is averaged from our October 2023 survey of 1,500 homeowners who purchased replacement windows ... Our survey data shows Pella buyers spent an average of $10,828 when ...

Another reason you may consider choosing among the best replacement window brands are when you’re upgrading to more efficient windows or simply updating the look of your home. Whatever the ...

All products and services featured are independently selected by our editors. However, when you buy something through our retail links, we may earn an affiliate commission. Choosing the right ...

Thank you for reporting this station. We will review the data in question. You are about to report this weather station for bad data. Please select the information that is incorrect.